4 Comments
author

this is a comment from wing commander ragashree. thank you, wing commander, for the generous words.

Rajeev Srinivasan's article provides a comprehensive analysis of the political contest in Thiruvananthapuram, focusing on the contrasting profiles and potential contributions of the candidates, Shashi Tharoor and Rajeev Chandrasekhar. Srinivasan adeptly navigates through the complexities of the electoral landscape, offering insights into the candidates' backgrounds, ideologies, and past achievements.

One of the article's strengths lies in its balanced approach, as Srinivasan acknowledges his personal admiration for Tharoor while objectively evaluating Chandrasekhar's merits. By highlighting Chandrasekhar's journey from Silicon Valley to Indian politics, Srinivasan portrays him as a dynamic figure with a proven track record in entrepreneurship and governance.

Furthermore, Srinivasan effectively utilizes Ambassador T P Sreenivasan's biography of Chandrasekhar to delve deeper into the candidate's motivations and principles. He contrasts Chandrasekhar's ethos with the Congress manifesto, emphasizing themes such as nationalism, economic growth, and accountability.

Moreover, Srinivasan's critique of the political and business environment in India, as illustrated through Chandrasekhar's experiences with BPL Cellular, adds depth to the discussion. He underscores the challenges faced by entrepreneurs and the role of corruption in hindering progress, thus framing Chandrasekhar's candidacy within the broader context of economic development and governance reform.

Additionally, Srinivasan's exploration of Chandrasekhar's involvement in technology and his potential impact on areas such as AI, semiconductors, and space technology adds a forward-looking dimension to the analysis. By linking Chandrasekhar's political aspirations to India's technological advancement, Srinivasan underscores the candidate's relevance in shaping the country's future trajectory.

The article offers a compelling narrative that goes beyond mere political rhetoric, providing readers with valuable insights into the candidates' backgrounds, ideologies, and potential contributions to Thiruvananthapuram's development. Through meticulous research and balanced analysis, Srinivasan succeeds in providing a critical appreciation of the electoral dynamics in Thiruvananthapuram, leaving readers with a deeper understanding of the stakes involved in the upcoming contest.

Expand full comment

For a common man with minimum logic and common sense will only support Rajeev. However if you go beyond the outskirts especially coastal areas, folks are 'controlled' by the bishop mafia.

Saint Sree Narayana Guru was the first 'Gear Wapsi' architect of Kerala , He consecrated Subramaniya swamy temple near Kunnumpara - closer to Kovalam. If he had spent more time in coastal areas, the whole catholic and muslim communities would have re-embraced Hinduism.

After defeating Kazhakkuttathum pillar, King Marthanda Varma took the nair ladies in tharavaad and 'donated' to mukkuvas. So in one of the 'Thuras' you'll see fair skinned ladies - progenies of nair ladies. Not being racial , but real stuff. This time, there might be few groups who will support Rajeev. City will definitely prefer Rajeev instead of your family friend. Btw I am also a former BPL employee ..

Rajeev will transform the land of Lord Ananthapadmanabhan. Your family friend will keep installing lamp posts and write some books. and Panniyan will destroy the land. simple ..thanks :)

Expand full comment